Bribery & Corruption
- We were instructed to advise a global group operating in 120 markets in relation to the sufficiency of its anti-bribery and corruption systems and controls, and to draft a bribery and corruption policy for the group in line with international best practice (US FCPA and UK Bribery Act).
- We acted for the Hungarian national oil and gas company, MOL, in a major dispute with Croatia involving domestic criminal liability under both Croatian and Hungarian law, international standards for criminal investigations and prosecutions, mutual legal assistance, extradition, the granting of safe passage, the issuance of Red Notices, and the enforceability of arbitral awards.
- Peters & Peters represented a conglomerate following the execution of multiple search warrants by the SFO. The SFO investigation arose as a result of, and in conjunction with, worldwide enquiries, investigations and prosecutions. The conglomerate, its agents, officers and employees were suspected of making corrupt payments to foreign public officials over a number of years and in a number of jurisdictions.
- We represented a high profile client in the Middle East, linked to the widely reported international investigation into the alleged misappropriation of assets from the Malaysian 1MDB sovereign wealth fund. We acted as primary legal advisor and coordinator of the global defence strategy. We managed an international team of law firms, managing responses to investigations in each jurisdiction and significant reputational issues for the client.
- Peters & Peters represented the former Business Director of a very large international chemicals company. Following an SFO investigation, the company pleaded guilty to bribery in Indonesia and Iran, and was sentenced in the UK and US. Unlike his co-defendants, our client avoided imprisonment and confiscation proceedings as a result of his cooperation.
- We acted for the former financial controller of an international group of companies servicing the oil and gas sectors, in a prosecution brought by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO). The allegations were that four defendants conspired to make corrupt payments to agents of two Nigerian State Boards of Internal Revenue for the purpose of avoiding, deferring or mitigating the tax liabilities of the company for whom the defendants worked. After a nine week trial our client was acquitted.